[63967] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Extreme BlackDiamond
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vivien M.)
Mon Oct 13 15:20:54 2003
From: "Vivien M." <vivienm@dyndns.org>
To: "'Matthew S. Hallacy'" <poptix@techmonkeys.org>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:16:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20031013172105.GA12485@techmonkeys.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On=20
> Behalf Of Matthew S. Hallacy
> Sent: October 13, 2003 1:21 PM
> To: Shazad - eServers; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Extreme BlackDiamond
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 05:52:59PM +0100, Shazad - eServers wrote:
> >=20
> > If you are so smart, GO and CHECK the HEADERS of that POST.=20
> Was it me?=20
> > NO IT WASENT.
>=20
> No offense, but:
[Snip]=20
> Looks like the exact same path to me.
You got the wrong post, I think...=20
Here are the headers I'm seeing:
Return-Path: <owner-nanog@merit.edu>
Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (postfix@trapdoor.merit.edu
[198.108.1.26])
by manganese.bos.dyndns.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
h9DFQclx048945;
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:26:38 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from owner-nanog@merit.edu)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix)
id 13A6191327; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:22:27 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: nanog-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56)
id 4F8D7912A4; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:17:54 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41])
by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957A9912D2
for <nanog@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:15:40 -0400
(EDT)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix)
id 83AD05DDA1; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: nanog@nanog.org
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [147.28.0.62])
by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EAB5DD98
for <nanog@nanog.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:15:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=3Droam.psg.com)
by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9)
id 1A94Q6-0007IZ-Ov
for nanog@nanog.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:15:39 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=3Droam.psg.com)
by roam.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 4.9)
id 1A94Q5-000Bct-K6
for nanog@nanog.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:15:37 +0200
Organization: eServers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=3D"us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Thread-Index: AcORlxEhs697B4/kSySyoICO+plTjQABXZYg
In-Reply-To: <E1A94MW-000BcH-IH@roam.psg.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-Id: <E1A94OK-00078H-8j@psg.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
From: "Shazad - eServers" <shazad@eservers.biz>
To: "'Randy Bush'" <randy@psg.com>
Subject: RE: Extreme BlackDiamond
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:13:25 +0100
Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
X-Loop: nanog
X-Spam-Status: -3.3 ()
BAYES_10,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,IN_REP_TO,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,QUOTED_EMAIL_T=
EXT
,X_LOOP
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36
As much as I hate to say it (and I'll probably regret getting into this
discussion), it does look like Randy hit the bounce option in pine or
whatever and sent Shazad's private reply straight to NANOG.
Vivien
--=20
Vivien M.
vivienm@dyndns.org
Assistant System Administrator
Dynamic DNS Network Services
http://www.dyndns.org/
