[63944] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Extreme BlackDiamond
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shazad - eServers)
Mon Oct 13 12:54:10 2003
Reply-To: <shazad@eservers.biz>
From: "Shazad - eServers" <shazad@eservers.biz>
To: "'Richard A Steenbergen'" <ras@e-gerbil.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:39:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20031013154907.GQ82121@overlord.e-gerbil.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I agree with you, Bouncing private messages onto the forum with a purpose of
making "me" look bad is really SAD.
I did it accidentally BUT quoted him, he literally bounced my message as If
I had sent it to NANOG.
Check your headers and you will find out, I never sent that message to
NANOG.
Maybe you guys should stop jumping to the gun (I have received like 130
private messages now), and read the headers to see I didn't send that
message to NANOG.
All I can do is apologies for not being in the wrong.
Peace out..
Best Regards,
Shazad
eServers - driving the "e" into your business.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard A Steenbergen
Sent: 13 October 2003 16:49
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Extreme BlackDiamond
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 04:39:09PM +0100, Shazad - eServers wrote:
>
> My apologies, There was no need for him to go around calling me a "dumb
> f***".
> I apologies, I didn't realise I had posted his message onto the nanog
> mailing list..
If the shoe fits...
Is it just me, or could nanog really benefit from being moderated, or at
least nanog-post being access controlled? God knows why I've kept skimming
it even after the majority of actual clueful network operators have long
since unsubscribed, but even this is beginning to stretch the limits of my
love for a good Jerry Springer fight.
Or should we all just start chanting:
Susan!
Susan!
Susan!
?
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
