[63940] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Frustrating loss of connectivity...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Oct 13 12:35:28 2003
To: alex@pilosoft.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:48:39 EDT."
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0310131147230.12333-100000@paix.pilosoft.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:24:28 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-2011630940P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:48:39 EDT, alex@pilosoft.com said:
> RFO: Colocation with people who have "business class DSL connectivity".
Notice that although doing that sort of colo is often frowned upon, the DSL
isn't the issue here. His direct provider is being responsive, but THEIR upstream
is failing to push the issue to the upstream-upstream. So he's got a pipe from A,
who's talking to B, and B is unwilling/unable to get C to deal with C's problem.
So the problem becomes "how to get C moving"..
I'm sitting at the end of multiple OC-12s, and I've had similar problems myself,
where a problem at some provider in another country causes operational issues
for myself. So it isn't a DSL-only issue.
--==_Exmh_-2011630940P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE/itG8cC3lWbTT17ARAp6VAJ0TCEkIyeWA9o3bnBpmpSyrXOD57QCg54yA
oAZ/8/Slf082DkpcMd+YCoo=
=rIF7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-2011630940P--
