[6385] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Would the list object...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Miller)
Mon Dec 2 21:25:27 1996
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:17:46 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <david@sparks.net>
To: Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19961202130409.007613c4@lint.cisco.com>
On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> I personally don't object, per se, but I dropped off the inet-access list
> earlier this year due to the unbearably low signal/noise ratio. If the
> NANOG list were to become a cacophony as did inet-access, you can scratch
> this list too.
>
> I figure that if anyone on inet-access is interested in the discussion(s)
> here on NANOG, then they are already subscribed.
Let me guess: Last spring during the CDA rants with Karl going full bore?
Yup, I logged off it too for a while. It's better now, few messages,
more signal. But the s/n is still a fraction of nanog:(
Still, as someone on the steep side of the learning curve I'd love to
have hyper-access to the things this list has covered.
--- David
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when
one doesn't know what one can't do!
