[63620] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: News coverage, Verisign etc.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (up@3.am)
Wed Oct 8 15:14:52 2003
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: up@3.am
To: nanog@merit.org
In-Reply-To: <p05100324bbaa050c95e1@[192.168.0.2]>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
In these days of corporate malfeasance scandal coverage, you'd think that
Verisign's tactics would have whetted the appetite of some bright
investigative reporter for one of the major publications.
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> I have gotten a reasoned response from the technology editor of the
> Washington Post, and we are discussing things. While I wouldn't have
> done it that way, he had a rational explanation of why the story was
> written the way it was, and definitely indicating there will be
> continuing coverage of the issue. He believes there's always room
> for improving coverage.
>
James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
up@3.am http://3.am
=========================================================================
