[6351] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Exchanges that matter...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan Heiliger)
Fri Nov 29 16:11:48 1996
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 13:07:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Jonathan Heiliger <loco@isi.net>
To: Derek Elder <djelder@accessus.net>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961129144521.6789B-100000@mtvernon1.accessus.net>
On Fri, 29 Nov 1996, Derek Elder wrote:
|} So is there a better solution for someone that doesn't actually want a
|} POP there now? If PAIX is the smartest connection facilities wise,
|} that is where we want to be. Are 2 DS-3 connections per router allowed
|} at PAIX? That would be the best solution -- cohab a router at PAIX,
|} DS-3 back to our core and DS-3 up to Pacbell.
|}
|} What am I missing?
Just that you'll have to eat extra circuit costs. While PAIX is a nicer,
newer and cleaner facility than what MFS has in San Jose for MAE-West; I
don't recall too many failures or complaints about the quality of that
facility. Ask BBN where their SJ POP is located.
Since I don't think this list has turned into 'network-engineering' I'll
stay away from the P*B NAP vs. MAE-West point. ;-)
-jh-
