[63400] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Will reverting DNS wildcard have any adverse affects?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rob Payne)
Sat Oct 4 10:40:44 2003
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:39:33 -0400
From: Rob Payne <rnspayne@the-paynes.com>
To: Piotr KUCHARSKI <chopin@sgh.waw.pl>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20031004134852.GA18494@sgh.waw.pl>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:48:52PM +0200, Piotr KUCHARSKI wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:34:07PM -0700, bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> > ask yourself how many DNS admins are going to go pull out
> > the "-delegation" stanzas from their configs? Or that
> > will use them to lie about other delegations that use wildcards
> > as long as that code is still available? ... =20
>=20
> And what possible problems are you expecting with leaving
> zone "com" { type delegation-only; };
> zone "net" { type delegation-only; };
> in the configuration?
>=20
> They should be delegation-only in any case, shouldn't they?
At some point in the future you might think back on this as someone
who said, "What possible problems would there be in hard-coding this
list of bogon filters? 69.0.0.0/8 should be reserved, shouldn't it?"
-rob
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQE/ftulgLX7/ptucWURAlR3AJdzFTDyyBhLmqXKqWrNW8EhSxynAJ9O7GGJ
qhFFDoRW0B9yajmRSsokkw==
=taDA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--
