[63281] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet privacy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Thu Oct 2 16:39:25 2003
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 16:38:51 -0400
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1065100932@imac-en0.delong.sj.ca.us>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 01:22:12PM -0700, Owen DeLong =
wrote:
> What valid reason is there for allowing a domain owner to be unlisted and
> uncontactable. If you want to remain anonymous, then you don't need a
> domain.
It is possible to be anonymous and contactable. Is that that good
enough (for domains, IP allocations, or other things served up via
whois)? Is it key we know the owners real identity, or just know
enough information to be able to contact them?
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/fIzbNh6mMG5yMTYRAlreAJ9uQBZHff/cE7BIWf21ZdR2QwOCcACfe4sL
9OFxysOPkrniFLiGEB8dIvU=
=ftlV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--
