[6320] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: NANOG 9 Date Change (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Leber)
Tue Nov 26 17:19:22 1996
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 14:16:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Leber <mleber@he.net>
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@zocalo.net>
cc: freedman@netaxs.com, nanog@merit.edu, srh@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199611261711.JAA12327@zocalo.net>
On Tue, 26 Nov 1996, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> If there's going to be a discussion of route-reflectors at peering points,
> I'd be happy to give a quick update on teh state of PCH, and I'd very much
> like to see a similar update on the state of CIX... (number of peers,
> average number of routes each contributes, filtering/bogon policy, etc.)
How is the MLPA at the SF Pac Bell NAP implemented? I understand that
there currently are 8 signatories to that agreement.
Many of these arrangements aren't big revenue generators (PCH for example)
and as such lack a marketing budget (which is a good thing -- keeps
user costs down), but this means they don't have much visibility.
It would be cool if there was a single place listing existing MLPA/route
reflectors (like CIX, PCH etc.) with links to pages for each of these
groups or estimates at the group size. The most appropriate place that
comes to mind is Bill Manning's Exchange Point page at
"http://www.isi.edu/div7/ra/naps.html".
What do you think Bill?
Mike.
+------------------- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -------------------+
| Mike Leber Direct Internet Connections Voice 408 282 1540 |
| Hurricane Electric Web Hosting & Co-location Fax 408 971 3340 |
| mleber@he.net http://www.he.net |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
