[63107] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [OT] question on NANOG meetings

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Petri Helenius)
Sat Sep 27 11:34:33 2003

Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:31:16 +0300
From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
To: Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200309271346.OAA02594@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Brandon Butterworth wrote:

>>the it behaves well in varying network conditions, which cannot be said 
>>from either WM or RM.
>>    
>>
>
>Quality of the link from encoder to Real server is important, send
>garbage to the server and it has nothing to distribute.
>
>  
>
One can screw it up earlier than that, send garbage to the encoder and 
it spends 90%
of the available bandwidth encoding noise.

>I get the impression it's done in band with other NANOG traffic and may
>be suffering against the warez traffic.
>
>  
>
Diffserv anyone?

Pete



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post