[63008] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Latency between Global Crossing & AT&T
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Levine)
Thu Sep 25 00:03:29 2003
In-Reply-To: <20030924235148.X4740-100000@phantom.eng.nac.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
From: Matt Levine <matt@deliver3.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:50 -0400
To: Steven Schecter <sjs@nac.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sep 24, 2003, at 11:55 PM, Steven Schecter wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone noticed excessively high latency between Global Crossing and
> AT&T? From what I've gathered, the PNIs between Global Crossing and
> AT&T
> are completely maxed out. The word is AT&T will not increase peering
> capacity with Global Crossing since their in bankruptcy protection. I
> am
> certain that this is affecting a large number of both Global Crossing
> and
> AT&T customers. I think it's fair to say that both Global Crossing and
> AT&T are amongst the larger Tier 1 providers out there, it's shameful
> that
> they can't come to an agreement on upgrading capacity.
A little poking around in the att/gblx route servers shows that
capacity issues in NYC/WDC are in the GBLX->ATT direction, FWIW..
>
> <snip>
>
--
Matt Levine <matt@deliver3.com>
"The Trouble with doing anything right the first time is that nobody
appreciates how difficult it was." -BIX
