|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: "Scott Granados" <scott@wworks.net> To: <alex@pilosoft.com> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:28:52 -0700 Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu Even though this is off topic, I'd have to say that this seems very odd from SpamHaus. They never seemed to isolate entire ranges but seemed more specific. I can also say they were very fast to remove issues once the spammers were removed and were also quite helpful. I wonder does this strategy demonstrate some sort of change or is it just a one off? ----- Original Message ----- From: <alex@pilosoft.com> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:14 PM Subject: Re: williams spamhaus blacklist > > > Maybe I've missed something but since when did spamhaus become vengeance > > oriented? All we try to do is eliminate as much spam as we can using a > > wide variety of blacklists at the same time. > The moment they started blacklisting IPs that never sent spam. (AKA > williams corporate mail servers). > > -alex > >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |