[62984] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: williams spamhaus blacklist
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Len Rose)
Wed Sep 24 18:17:26 2003
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:16:22 -0400
From: Len Rose <len@netsys.com>
To: alex@pilosoft.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309241656590.22469-100000@paix.pilosoft.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Maybe I've missed something but since when did spamhaus become
vengeance oriented? All we try to do is eliminate as much spam
as we can using a wide variety of blacklists at the same time.
Thanks
alex@pilosoft.com wrote:
> Customers who use blacklists compiled by vengeance-oriented folk deserve
> what they get: No email.
>
> Suggested solutions:
> a) whitelist williams
> b) stop using SBLs similar to spamhaus.
>
> It is a question of trust: Do you trust spamhaus to block 'evil' spammers?
>
> Do you trust them after they blocked important mails to your clients that
> could -not- -possibly- have been spam?
>
> Make your own conclusions.
>
> -alex
