[62911] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Verisign Responds

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Segrave)
Wed Sep 24 05:21:13 2003

Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:20:33 +0200
From: Jim Segrave <jes@nl.demon.net>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>,
	nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: jes@nl.demon.net
Mail-Followup-To: Jim Segrave <jes@nl.demon.net>,
	Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>,
	Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3F709C6F.5030106@cisco.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


On Tue 23 Sep 2003 (12:18 -0700), Eliot Lear wrote:
> 
> Randy Bush wrote:
  
> >all this noise and bluster is depressing.  it indicates that
> >we are in a very quickly maturing industry because a lot of
> >probably-soon-to-be-ex engineers have too much time on their
> >hands.
> 
> I take a different view.  If people who are upset with Verisign's change 
> DON'T say anything, then there's no reason for Verisign to change.  I 
> suspect that the better forum may be one's Congress person...

And the usual US-centric view...

Which congress person does Demon Netherlands, T-dialin, Wanadoo
France, Tiscali etc. go to?

-- 
Jim Segrave           jes@nl.demon.net

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post