[62842] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verisign Responds
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Crist Clark)
Tue Sep 23 14:29:06 2003
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:25:35 -0700
From: Crist Clark <crist.clark@globalstar.com>
To: bmanning@karoshi.com
Cc: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>, Dave Stewart <dbs@dbscom.com>,
nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: crist.clark@globalstar.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dave Stewart wrote:
> > > > > Courts are likely to support the position that Verisign has control of .net
> > > > > and .com and can do pretty much anything they want with it.
> > > > ISC has made root-delegation-only the default behaviour in the new bind,
> > > > how about drafting up an RFC making it an absolute default requirement for
> > > > all DNS?
> > > That would be making a fundamental change to the DNS
> > > to make wildcards illegal anywhere. Is that what you
> > > want?
> >
> > no it wouldnt. it would ust make wildcards illegal in top level domains,
> > not subdomains.
> >
> > -Dan
>
> really? and how would that work? (read be enforced...)
The same way all RFCs and Standards are enforced, by the IETF Delta
Squad Elite Stormtrooper Interdiction Unit Strike Force.
--
Crist J. Clark crist.clark@globalstar.com
Globalstar Communications (408) 933-4387
