[62840] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verisign Responds
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Tue Sep 23 14:20:14 2003
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
To: goemon@anime.net (Dan Hollis)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 11:17:05 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: bmanning@karoshi.com, dbs@dbscom.com (Dave Stewart),
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309231112160.365-100000@sasami.anime.net> from "Dan Hollis" at Sep 23, 2003 11:13:22 AM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dave Stewart wrote:
> > > > Courts are likely to support the position that Verisign has control of .net
> > > > and .com and can do pretty much anything they want with it.
> > > ISC has made root-delegation-only the default behaviour in the new bind,
> > > how about drafting up an RFC making it an absolute default requirement for
> > > all DNS?
> > That would be making a fundamental change to the DNS
> > to make wildcards illegal anywhere. Is that what you
> > want?
>
> no it wouldnt. it would ust make wildcards illegal in top level domains,
> not subdomains.
>
> -Dan
really? and how would that work? (read be enforced...)
--bill
