[62767] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Riverhead or Lancope?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Martin)
Mon Sep 22 07:52:32 2003
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 04:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Martin <mj0u812@yahoo.com>
To: John Obi <dalnetuzer@yahoo.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20030922081338.42863.qmail@web41704.mail.yahoo.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I have been using Lancope for alomost two years. They
have developed a very effective complementary approach
to the signature based systems I have been evaluating
(SNORT, ISS, SOURCEFIRE, CISCO) using.
The latest software release has also provided a number
of key enhancements that allow the tool not only to be
NIDS, but a great network auditing and troubleshooting
tool as well.
\michael martin
--- John Obi <dalnetuzer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Nanogers,
>
> Did you ever tested Riverhead or Lancope? I know
> rackspace uses one or both of them.
>
> Are they good products and worth the try?
>
> Can they really decrease the the DDoS damage?
>
> Are they better than CISCO products?
>
> Are there any tips?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -J
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
