[6259] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internic address allocation policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bradley Ward Allen)
Fri Nov 22 19:31:35 1996
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Bradley Ward Allen <ulmo@Q.Net>
Date: 22 Nov 1996 19:27:13 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Michael,
Thank you for your note. It explains a lot to me and likely others.
It also resembles the way SRI-NIC.ARPA used to do business.
Perhaps it confuses me to see unknowns jumping into place calling
SCRUZ-NET an unknown entity when it's run by people whom so many
people *DO* know. Just ask Jim Haynes <haynes@cats.ucsc.edu>. These
people aren't randoms.
Well, sorry, Jim, I don't mean to be volunteering you, but the point
is how can honesty be questioned? It seems to superfluous to me to
say that they have little honesty. In the name of reducing routing
tables Internic Inc. (what a name) has instead been increasing them!
If it were John Q. Doe <thisiscool@interthisiscoolnet.com.net.com.net>,
ok so ask for a plan and judge their honesty; John needs good service
too. But, when it's Matthew, I mean sheesh! We're not talking about
the admin of interthisiscoolnet.com.net.com.net here. Some of
SCRUZ-NET's customers have been major international news before
(remember NAZIs and Germany and Compuserve and censorship?) It's not
like they don't exist. As little as I like the NAZIs, I like the
ability to keep track of their pulse so I know when to take cover and
shoot.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQEVAwUBMpZE1pxWhFYc6x9VAQGNlggAplrrmtLHBsoNQw6/ft34E83rYtGumwqz
aK2rYPlw62Jm9VXBlLqvEPn/ea1zVxuNNuYs69MpBtGJiF/P2XoG9i0Fb51rZRqH
VXojuyd9BlKp1cR9mbJb28F6c5qmJantSFH1Cr6a/d2eMM/g5Ig+dLwuT0x4xpMF
8LSTie9puBrblISYlXT3dIGFsO/ZXDFY/dj96mn1eYO5JzBSjbimmFM4crPfTr+p
UISoIZySjeGAOOz1/q6Z9/KSllSUFkJ1t86itXem5T0wCgSYUYAaZc9mJWDmbriR
Ah4VZgfOvFWA9/90kHShkABOOtKz4/2z0AeSgDPLpdp+BbEnw7fhQQ==
=yPIG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
