[62536] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Worst design decisions?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charles Sprickman)
Thu Sep 18 17:37:59 2003
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:32:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Charles Sprickman <spork@inch.com>
To: Ejay Hire <ejay.hire@isdn.net>
Cc: "Peter E. Fry" <pfry@swbell.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <B0291F8CF6D74440A1175DD8E107802304BA1D@bnaw2kmsx01.BNA01.ISDN.NET>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Ejay Hire wrote:
> Who needs a console port on a Bay? Site angler will save the day!
Get it right! Site Mangler!
What fond memories...
> ... Err, sorry, coming off of a power outage with nothing to do but
> drink coffee.
>
> -e
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter E. Fry [mailto:pfry@swbell.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:02 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Worst design decisions?
>
>
> David Barak wrote:
>
> > Personally my issues are console-cable related: is
> > there a benefit to the HUGE variety of console pinouts
> > used by the various hardware vendors? Just look at
> > vendor C as an example [...]
>
> Is that the best example you can come up with? Ever use any Bay
> equipment...?
> Heh. Makes me want to add "I hate it when that happens", as in "Ever
> put your head in a vise and crank it down real tight...?"
>
> Peter E. Fry
>
>
