[62432] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Worst design decisions?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Lesher)
Thu Sep 18 10:07:26 2003
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu (nanog list)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:01:27 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <3F6998E0.392CFA96@lists.rauhauser.net> from "neal rauhauser" at Sep 18, 2003 06:37:04 AM
Reply-To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Sorry, I missed the hands-down winner in my initial thinking,
since it's not in my arena [hardware]..
The envelope please..
Micro$loth Lookout....
{applause}
Starting with "Let's invent top-posting" and moving to its
virus-spreading abilities; Lookout has never met a standard, either
hard [written/RFC] or not [consensus] that it could not wound/kill.
Further, it damages the thinking of its users almost as well
as drug dealers wares -- be that crack or this week's over-hyped
anti-depress^H^H^H mood-fixer. It's the Newspeak of the current
era.
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
