[62322] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BIND 9 (Re: ISC Patches)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Len Sassaman)
Wed Sep 17 14:36:07 2003
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Len Sassaman <rabbi@quickie.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
> it's under consideration now. bind8 is not a priority for the bind forum,
> and isc would rather put it in feature-freeze, but we're looking into it.
> bind9's internals make "delegation-only" easy to implement. bind8's
> internals are pretty twisty.
This would certainly be appreciated. I have my BIND 8 name servers patched
with a modified version of this:
http://sam.zoy.org/writings/internet/verisign/patch-bind-8.4.1.0-dickhead.diff
... but it certainly isn't as clean as I'd like.
--Len.
