[62309] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Change to .com/.net behavior
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Devine, II)
Wed Sep 17 13:46:44 2003
From: "William Devine, II" <william@smartguys.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:45:09 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Why not just make your users use your servers for forwarding DNS and block
outbound DNS requests @ your router for anything but your servers.
I mean, if you're going to go to the extreme & force your users to not have
access to something they might like (for some unknown reason), might as well
go way overboard.
william
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Shore" <listuser@numbnuts.net>
To: "Christopher X. Candreva" <chris@westnet.com>
Cc: "Vadim Antonov" <avg@kotovnik.com>; "Matt Larson"
<mlarson@verisign.com>; <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Change to .com/.net behavior
>
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> >
> > > I'm going to hack my BIND so it'll discard wildcard RRs in TLDs, as a
> > > matter of reducing the flood of advertising junk reaching my desktop.
> >
> > Please share your hack !
>
> I've implemented the official ISC Bind hack on every single one of my name
> servers and am pushing it and the configuration changes out to my
> customers as a *required* upgrade.
>
> Justin
>
>
