[62246] in North American Network Operators' Group
Neeed a new RFC?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roy)
Wed Sep 17 00:50:48 2003
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:46:55 -0700
From: Roy <garlic@garlic.com>
To: ">"@redwood-en0.garlic.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20030916234134.GW2507@rayw.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
We need a peremptive strike to create our own RFC that says not to do this.
Ray Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:07:21PM -0600, John Neiberger wrote:
>
>>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20030916/D7TJOF3G0.html
>>--
>
>
> my favorite:
> VeriSign spokesman Brian O'Shaughnessy said Tuesday that individual
> service providers were free to configure their systems so customers
> would bypass Site Finder. But he questioned whether releasing a patch
> to do so would violate Internet standards.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> What else is there to say? Any bets that Verisign tries to accuse ISC
> of being a terrorist organization once the patch comes out? At the least
> a spurious lawsuit seems certain.
>
>
