[621] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Comments on Routing and Allocation Policy Wanted

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (D. Brian Kimmel)
Sat Sep 30 14:15:32 1995

To: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu, briank@kimbro.kimbro.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 1995 02:28:05 MDT."
             <Pine.LNX.3.91.950930022736.332B-100000@iMach.com> 
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 1995 11:11:56 -0700
From: "D. Brian Kimmel" <briank@kimbro.com>

forrestc@imach.com writes

>   Standard Dialup SLIP, CSLIP and PPP customers will be allocated a 
> Single Static IP Address to be used to configure their software.  There 
> are many advantages to be gained by Statically allocating the numbers, 
> including the ability to have multiple mailboxes by using SMTP, etc.
 
How about a pool of dynamic addresses for most folks and static for
only those who have a _real_ need for such a thing.  That way you don't
tie up a lot of addresses for occasional and casual users who have no
_real_ need for static addresses.

Ease of configuration of software should not be a reason for static
addresses.

Brian
D. Brian Kimmel               Kimbro, Inc.        Voice: (206) 937-8381
Seattle, WA  USA         http://www.kimbro.com        briank@kimbro.com
Washington Internet Provider List  http://www.kimbro.com/providers.html


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post