[61886] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cable & Wireless, Verio and/or Level 3 port blocking?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jason Frisvold)
Mon Sep 8 16:41:26 2003
From: Jason Frisvold <friz@corp.ptd.net>
To: "William Devine, II" <william@smartguys.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <003401c3763a$de105960$6401a8c0@corp.pgtechinc.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:39:39 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--=-OaMRTaG0o+SRItvb1Ey8
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 14:56, William Devine, II wrote:
> Can anyone from these three carriers tell me if you're doing port blockin=
g
> on the Windows file/print ports (135-139, 445 & 593) ?
> A client of ours (in the US), against our recommendation, still wants to
> connect to their Exchange server in the UK without a VPN. We're not
> blocking their IP#'s from anything but somewhere in between it's getting
> blocked. We use C&W directly and Verio/Level3 through a peer.
Can they set up a gre tunnel? I did this for a site to site active
directory setup and it worked out great... :)
> Thanks!
> william
--=20
---------------------------
Jason H. Frisvold
Backbone Engineering Supervisor
Penteledata Engineering
friz@corp.ptd.net
RedHat Engineer - RHCE # 807302349405893
Cisco Certified - CCNA # CSCO10151622
MySQL Core Certified - ID# 205982910
---------------------------
"Imagination is more important than knowledge.
Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles
the world."
-- Albert Einstein [1879-1955]
--=-OaMRTaG0o+SRItvb1Ey8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA/XOkHRsoFMdDaiQgRAm0AAKCnYpqNQUYVe/horikKEodkeBdmpgCgutJ5
NUvft7i0NKTz9B34MzI5HY8=
=hTVz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-OaMRTaG0o+SRItvb1Ey8--
