[61815] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Important changes to the .org tld today.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Neil J. McRae)
Fri Sep 5 10:42:19 2003
To: rjoffe@centergate.com (Rodney Joffe)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:39:08 +0100 (BST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu (NANOG)
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Rodney Joffe" at Sep 05, 2003 07:01:55 AM
From: neil@DOMINO.ORG (Neil J. McRae)
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> For those of you who *will* have to troubleshoot inconsistent DNS
> answers between the two systems, you've now had a "head's up".
> Especially those who hard code the root data (see the Nanog archives for
> discussions regarding hard coded root hints files). ;-)
Rodney, I couldn't agree with you more, but the post looked like
a pretty poor attempt to stick one at Verisign. Maybe I got
the wrong end of the stick.
Its great that the namespace is evolving, but a pity to see
it being used as point scoring exercise with the competition.
If random ISP Y came on and said that packets would arrive faster
through their new BOZOroute engine that controls BGP4 with the
force and unlike Cisco based ISP's blah blah.
Regards,
Neil.
[p.s. can someone tell me whats the difference between a real ISP
and [I suppose] an unreal ISP?]