[6168] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internic address allocation policy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Ranney)
Mon Nov 18 23:18:08 1996
From: Matt Ranney <mjr@wacky.eit.com>
To: web@typo.org (Wayne Bouchard)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 20:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199611190311.UAA07011@typo.org> from "Wayne Bouchard" at Nov 18, 96 08:11:57 pm
Wayne Bouchard writes...
>
> Heartily agreed.. Its far far easier to get address space when you've
> got the docs to prove you need it and you've allocated
> intelligently. They require you to justify need, why shouldn't you
> require customers requesting multiple class Cs to justify need?
Do larger providers have to play by the same rules, or do they all
still have so much extra space from the pre-CIDR days that it doesn't
matter? I ask because I know of at least one BBN customer that less
than a year ago was assigned 3 /24's for their 30 machine network.
--
Matt Ranney - mjr@eit.com
This is how I sign all my messages.
