[6162] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Internic address allocation policy

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Kozowski)
Mon Nov 18 21:59:56 1996

Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 18:51:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Kozowski <kozowski@structured.net>
To: matthew@scruz.net
Cc: nanog@merit.edu

Everyone has a problem getting address space.  That's a fact of life with
the current IP allocation policy.

My suggestion is to ask for a /18, with the rest of the /16 reserved for
your use.  Religiously SWIP or RWhois your allocations.  Get network
engineering documents from your customers _before_ you assign address 
space.  Yes, all of the above is a pain in the ass.  But that's life.

And lastly, don't take your frustration out on Kim Hubbard or anyone else
at the InterNIC (and yes, I'm guilty).  They're just enforcing the policy.
It's a tough place to be in.

And _please_ keep the lawyers out of this.

ObLaywerJoke:  

Q. What you have when there are 100 lawyers buried up to their necks in
sand?

A. Not enough sand!


-- 
Eric Kozowski              Senior Network Engineer
eric@structured.net        Structured Network Systems, Inc.
(503)656-3235 FAX          Better, Cheaper, Faster -- pick any two. 
(800)881-0962 Voice        http://www.structured.net/
"Providing High Quality, Reliable Internet Service" -- 56k to DS3

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post