[61596] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What if it doesn't affect the ISP? (was Re: What do you want your
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Sat Aug 30 16:09:45 2003
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
To: sean@donelan.com (Sean Donelan)
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: iljitsch@muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum),
nanog@merit.edu (NANOG)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0308301435200.11413-100000@clifden.donelan.com> from "Sean Donelan" at Aug 30, 2003 02:54:22 PM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Bits are bits, very few of them actually impact the ISP itself. Most
Lies! all the bits that pass through the ISP impact
the ISP. Generally in the fiscal arena. More bits == More cash.
> Or some major ISPs seem to have the practice of letting the infected
> computers continuing attacking as long as it doesn't hurt their
> network.
Or for fiscal reasons...
-- bill (being cynical in WDC)
