[61366] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fw: GLBX ICMP rate limiting (was RE: Tier-1 without their own
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (variable@ednet.co.uk)
Thu Aug 28 11:48:15 2003
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:41:03 +0100 (BST)
From: "variable@ednet.co.uk" <variable@ednet.co.uk>
To: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.53.0308281500510.171@rampart.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> Rate-limiting ICMP is 'ok' if you, as the provider, think its worthwhile
> and you, as the provider, want to deal with the headache phone calls...
Would it be fair to say that UUNET haven't been asked by Homeland Security
to do the rate limiting that GLBX claim they have been asked to do? Has
anyone else been asked to rate limit by the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security?
Rich
