[61297] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Palmer)
Wed Aug 27 16:56:17 2003
From: "John Palmer" <nanog@adns.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 15:53:44 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I hear that Level 3 is good but do they handle small stuff like T-1?
We may be looking to dual-home soon and will be looking around.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Crandall" <sean@megapath.net>
To: "'Rick Ernst'" <erond@legendz.com>; <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:48
Subject: RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone?
>
> > One of the providers we are looking at is Level-3. Any
> > comments good/bad on
> > reliability and clue? We already have UU, Sprint, and AT&T.
> > I also realize
> > that the "they suck less" list changes continuously... :)
>
> I have about 5 GB of IP transit connections from Level3 across 8 markets
> (plus using their facilities for our backbone). Level3 has been very solid
> on the IP transit side.
>
> MFN/AboveNet has also been very good to us.
>
> -Sean
>
> Sean P. Crandall
> VP Engineering Operations
> MegaPath Networks Inc.
> 6691 Owens Drive
> Pleasanton, CA 94588
> (925) 201-2530 (office)
> (925) 201-2550 (fax)
>
>
>
>
