[61222] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Opinion on null0'ing entire 218.0.0.0?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Aug 26 10:33:57 2003
To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:47:22 EDT."
<75634F04BFCFD511BF69009027DC86495C6444@mailman.thenap.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:31:55 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1436031260P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:47:22 EDT, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver@thenap.com> said:
> Is anyone getting hundreds of thousands of spasm a day from 218.0.0.0 like I
> am? Has anyone actually considered null routing the whole block?
>
> Is there actually any 'users' in APNIC space? Or is it all spam from korea?
null0 them - I guarantee if you do, you won't receive any complaints. :)
--==_Exmh_1436031260P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE/S29acC3lWbTT17ARAo96AKCtpfJP5tfM8VpaFalypSYwVEzVTACZAXSW
LLo7tuw6EvPkRwhEw7UCfYs=
=F/Ls
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1436031260P--
