[61075] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Cisco filter question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geo.)
Fri Aug 22 13:14:58 2003
From: "Geo." <georger@getinfo.net>
To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>,
"Jack Bates" <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: "Scott McGrath" <mcgrath@fas.harvard.edu>,
"Geo." <georger@getinfo.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:10:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308221759110.7076-100000@MrServer>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>point a route to null0 and set the next hop to be down that route
makes no difference, the problem isn't that the packets aren't being routed
to null0, the problem is that the packets don't match the route-map for some
reason. Only difference I see is the fragment flag is set to allow fragment
on the ones that are getting thru.
Geo.
