[6097] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why doesn't BGP... -Reply
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon Zeeff)
Tue Nov 12 09:41:30 1996
From: jon@branch.net (Jon Zeeff)
To: freedman@netaxs.com (Avi Freedman)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 09:31:39 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Neal_Castagnoli@novell.com, edm@halcyon.com, freedman@netaxs.com,
deepak@jain.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199611121321.IAA27938@access.netaxs.com> from "Avi Freedman" at Nov 12, 96 08:21:18 am
> Quick comment: You're looking at the computing of routes wrt one router.
> I'm suggesting that perhaps we should consider the set of all routers since
> we're concerned about spreading load due to the quick communication from
> one router to many of every best external-path changing.
Some people are concerned with that and others are concerned with
end-node (or close to it) routers where this is not an issue. I
suspect nanog has a good mix with many who run both types.
