[60785] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: microsoft.com

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Fri Aug 15 19:44:19 2003

Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 18:40:49 -0500
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Crist.Clark@globalstar.com
Cc: "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <grisha@ispol.com>,
	Jason Baugher <jasonbaugher@adams.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3F3D2E72.D07C3815@globalstar.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Crist Clark wrote:
> Some news outlets are reporting this is actually Microsoft's plan,
> 
>   http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5064433.html
> 

I'm sure Microsoft is aware that many networks are severly pissed off 
about the extra overhead they are enduring because of this worm. I think 
my helpdesk said, "Fry 'em." While we'll continue monitoring and 
cleaning up systems scanning for infections, the DOS side of the worm 
and variants is rather tame and will be allowed through so long as it 
meets standard egress/ingress policy. I just can't see a bunch of 
already employee starved networks devoting more resources just to save 
Microsoft from their own vulnerability.


-Jack


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post