[60758] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: microsoft.com

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy)
Fri Aug 15 14:53:34 2003

Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 14:33:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <grisha@ispol.com>
To: Jason Baugher <jasonbaugher@adams.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <962714A43FA5154A803EFCD0E9DBED0B057249@atc-mail.adams.corp>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



nslookup www.windowsupdate.com
Server:  ns2.nv.cox.net
Address:  68.100.16.25

*** ns2.nv.cox.net can't find www.windowsupdate.com: Non-existent host/domain

Grisha

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Jason Baugher wrote:

>
> Actually faster than usual here, probably due to akamai:
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> www.windowsupdate.com   canonical name =
> windowsupdate.microsoft.nsatc.net.
> windowsupdate.microsoft.nsatc.net       canonical name =
> windowsupdate.microsoft.com.edgesuite.net.
> windowsupdate.microsoft.com.edgesuite.net       canonical name =
> a822.cd.akamai.net.
> Name:   a822.cd.akamai.net
> Address: 166.90.148.198
> Name:   a822.cd.akamai.net
> Address: 166.90.148.199
> Name:   a822.cd.akamai.net
> Address: 166.90.148.215
> Name:   a822.cd.akamai.net
> Address: 166.90.148.233
> Name:   a822.cd.akamai.net
> Address: 166.90.148.246
> Name:   a822.cd.akamai.net
> Address: 166.90.148.247
>
> Jason Baugher
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: up@3.am [mailto:up@3.am]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 8:46 AM
> To: Huopio Kauto
> Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'
> Subject: RE: microsoft.com
>
>
>
>
> Yeah:
>
>  7  sl-gw29-nyc-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.13.16)  8.728 ms  8.674 ms
> 8  sl-ft-10-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.171.90)  12.338 ms  11.911 ms  9
> P13-0.NYKCR2.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.241.30)  37.556 ms 10
> P2-0.NYKBB5.New-york.opentransit.net (193.251.241.230)  12.385 ms 11
> 81.52.249.16 (81.52.249.16)  13.164 ms  19.364 ms  12.446 ms
>
> Interestingly, there's no reverse dns for 81.52.249.16 and it shows as
> being RIPE space...allocated to Akamai...do you suppose this is to
> minimize embarassment to MS that they would have to use Akamai?
>
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Huopio Kauto wrote:
>
> >
> > It seems that Microsoft is Akamai'zing as we speak..
> >
> > --Kauto
> >
> > Kauto Huopio - kauto.huopio@ficora.fi
> > Information Security Adviser / CERT-FI -coordinator
> > Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority / CERT-FI
> > tel. +358-9-6966772, fax. +358-9-6966515
> > CERT-FI duty desk +358-9-6966510 / http://www.cert.fi
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan Heitman [mailto:bryan@bryanheitman.com]
> > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 8:48 AM
> > To: nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: microsoft.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Several networks I have talked to are reporting they can't get to
> > www.microsoft.com
> >
> > Has the virus began?  anyone?
> >
> >
> > Bryan
> >
>
> James Smallacombe		      PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor
> up@3.am							    http://3.am
> ========================================================================
> =
>
>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post