[60580] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: How much longer..

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Francis)
Thu Aug 14 11:46:51 2003

Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 08:44:35 -0700
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle@darkuncle.net>
To: Dragos Ruiu <dr@kyx.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: Dragos Ruiu <dr@kyx.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200308131609.05794.dr@kyx.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



--F7w+4yMapWozG0Ib
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:09:05PM -0700, dr@kyx.net said:
> These kinds of inflated damages estimates are dubious at best.
> If you've lost that much productivity, odds are you should be pointing
> fingers at inapropriate redundancy and planning/procedures in your=20
> computing facilities and not blaming some toy programs written by kids=20
> with too much time. This kind of financial loss hype/fear-mongering is be=
st
> left to politicians, and not technical discussions.

indeed - and yet companies claim these kind of damages, at least publicly,
whenever these worms come along (every month or two, it seems). Two questio=
ns
spring to mind: 1) where are these figures coming from, and 2) if they're
accurate, why in the world would a company make the same mistake that cost
them a million bucks last month, again next month? That's the kind of stuff
that gets executives fired (you'd think) ...

(note: the figures I posted were just gathered from publicly available news
sources. We all know how accurate reporters tend to be when covering
technical issues, so take them with a grain of salt. The point of the post
was, there are a great many companies out there throwing good money after
bad, month after month, without seeming to realize it.)
--=20
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
      illum oportet crescere me autem minui

--F7w+4yMapWozG0Ib
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/O65iWaB7jFU39ScRAm5KAJ9ky2Zn970PiH6zzJZDbee2bvwT5QCgmy96
Yc7RwY/GZ5djSziSOYBXtgk=
=pR69
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--F7w+4yMapWozG0Ib--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post