[60530] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Kristoff)
Wed Aug 13 16:53:35 2003
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:52:28 -0500
From: John Kristoff <jtk@depaul.edu>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3F39E467.9FB18615@cisco.com>
Reply-To: jtk@aharp.is-net.depaul.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:10:32 +0200
Robert Raszuk <raszuk@cisco.com> wrote:
> That is fine. The amount of information to be carried is easily
> extensible. So if you can help us to determine the required fields we
> will be more then glad to add them.
Deploying this as a signalling protocol that is separated from BGP may
make sense. Although the ease/speed of deployment by using BGP may make
this a worthwhile effort.
John
