[60497] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Kaufman)
Wed Aug 13 12:09:18 2003
From: "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew@eeph.com>
To: "'McBurnett, Jim'" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:08:43 -0700
In-Reply-To: <9BF6F06C4BC90746ADD6806746492A332AED19@msmmail01.msmgmt.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On
> Behalf Of McBurnett, Jim
>... I really can not image
> legitimate traffic on 135..
My problem with this approach is that, in 1985, you could have said "I
really cannot imagine legitimate traffic on port 80".
(On the other hand, you could probably say that today and be mostly right)
Matthew Kaufman
matthew@eeph.com
