[60442] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bob German)
Tue Aug 12 12:09:18 2003
From: "Bob German" <bobgerman@irides.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:08:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20030812155038.GA27073@sunet.se>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
IMHO it's a prudent security measure to disallow access to the Windows
ports 135,137-139,445, etc. from the Internet at large. We block these
ports at the edge, with exceptions for the very few customers who ask
for it (generally customers using Exchange who don't know how to
properly deploy it across the Internet).
So we block, but we make exceptions. Not that restrictive, and not that
hard.
-Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Mans Nilsson
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:51 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Jack Bates
Subject: Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus
Subject: Re: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus Date: Tue,
Aug 12, 2003 at 10:36:12AM -0500 Quoting Jack Bates
(jbates@brightok.net):
>=20
> Is it just me that feels that blocking a port which is known to be=20
> used
> to perform billions of scans is only proper? It takes time to contact,
> clean, or suspend an account that is infected. Allowing infected
systems=20
> to continue to scan only causes problems for other networks. I see no=20
> network performance issues, but that doesn't mean other networks won't
> have issues.
I have two faces, let's hear what they say:
"I am a network operator. I do not see issues with my network unless
somebody fills it up beyond capacity. Then I might ask somebody a
question as to why they are shoveling so many more packets than usual.
If it is a panic, I might null0 someone. I just want to keep my network
transparent."
"I am a systems administrator. Sometimes, there are security problems
with=20
my operating systems of choice. Then, I fix those hosts that are
affected, and all is well. The network is not bothering me as long as
it is=20
transparent."=20
Your chosen path is a down-turning spiral of kludgey dependencies, where
a host is secure only on some nets, and some nets can't cope with the
load of all administrative filters (some routers tend to take
port-specific filters into slow-path). That way lies madness.=20
--=20
M=E5ns Nilsson Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC
MN1334-RIPE
Oh my GOD -- the SUN just fell into YANKEE STADIUM!!
