[60215] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Blocking port 135?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Aug 4 01:33:25 2003
To: Mans Nilsson <mansaxel@sunet.se>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Aug 2003 10:46:54 +0200."
<20030802084654.GA27103@sunet.se>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 01:32:45 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-89087584P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 10:46:54 +0200, Mans Nilsson said:
> - Inform them that devices found to be broken into will be sent to null0
> until proof of cleanliness has been obtained.
And then they download the patches how? (This is particularly a problem
if the customer is using a NAT to obfuscate the IP addresses, leaving you with only
one address to null0...)
--==_Exmh_-89087584P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE/Le/8cC3lWbTT17ARAlfQAKDydn1WwT8y70OUh7J0GGc1gtIJbQCbBXbO
u6Q0qkxHYZuMHsYE8/+zHm4=
=sqDF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-89087584P--
