[60147] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Blocking port 135?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Fri Aug 1 15:37:12 2003
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
To: chris@UU.NET (Christopher L. Morrow)
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 12:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sean@donelan.com (Sean Donelan), nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.53.0308011921460.693@rampart.argfrp.us.uu.net> from "Christopher L. Morrow" at Aug 01, 2003 07:22:13 PM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> > In reality blocking port 135 is almost never sufficient. Its slightly
> > better than waving a dead chicken over your PC.
> >
>
> its far less stinky than the chicken option though, you must admit that.
>
only if you thaw before use...
http://home.xnet.com/~warinner/chickens.html
--bill
