[60069] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: North America not interested in IP V6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ronald van der Pol)
Thu Jul 31 09:33:33 2003
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:30:00 +0200
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Cc: "'Ronald van der Pol'" <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>,
"'Marshall Eubanks'" <tme@multicasttech.com>,
"'Neil J. McRae'" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>,
"'Nipper, Arnold'" <arnold@nipper.de>,
"'Peter Galbavy'" <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net>,
"'Roy'" <garlic@garlic.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <008201c35764$45c52540$210d640a@unfix.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 15:04:25 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> The bad news here, or actually good news, is that many ISP's don't
> register their client /48's.
...
> Many other tunnelbrokers exist, check for example freenet6, ipv6.he.net
> and xs26, who apparently have loads of delegations, these are
> not to be found in the registries either.
>
> Next to that many people still use 6bone space...
Right. And I only counted 2001:600::/23 :-( The other RIPE space
has:
2001:600::/23 728
2001:800::/23 213
2001:a00::/23 67
2001:1400::/23 30
2001:1600::/23 0
So a remark like "... no one in Europe is interested either." is
nonsense.
rvdp
