[60007] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: North America not interested in IP V6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (St. Clair, James)
Tue Jul 29 12:44:03 2003
From: "St. Clair, James" <JStClair@vredenburg.com>
To: "'Daryl G. Jurbala'" <daryl@introspect.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:42:14 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Please somebody correct me..Can't a provider simply NAT the IPv4 at his
gateway, and stream IPv6 to as many wireless customers as he can lock into a
painful long-term contract? (just kidding!)
The demand for /8's won't change any, and you can IPv6 and eat your cake
too. I do understand the v4 to v6 NAT'ing may be an issue...
-----Original Message-----
From: Daryl G. Jurbala [mailto:daryl@introspect.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 12:41 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: North America not interested in IP V6
> The reference to 70% of people in Europe having a web enabled
> phone made me laugh too... although I guess it could be true
> - my last 3 mobile phones have all had WAP capability, but I
> don't know of anyone that actually uses this feature.
I actually use mine. But it's behind a proxy, as I suspect nearly every
other provder's WAP gateway is.
Daryl Jurbala
