[600] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: number of unaggregated class C's in swamp?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Curtis Villamizar)
Fri Sep 29 14:57:52 1995
To: "William Allen Simpson" <bsimpson@morningstar.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
Reply-To: curtis@ans.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Sep 1995 15:16:20 GMT."
<1621.bsimpson@morningstar.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 14:54:07 -0400
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@ans.net>
In message <1621.bsimpson@morningstar.com>, "William Allen Simpson" writes:
> > From: Brian Renaud <renaud@merit.edu>
> > Here is the breakdown of 198 in the radb, showing the number of
> > route objects registered in 198 for /14 through /24.
> >
> > prefix length
> > prefix 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
> > ------ ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
> > 198.* 4 5 39 5 19 30 41 67 98 137 5314
> >
> This is interesting, showing how bad assignment has been even
> _after_ CIDR. 5K sites migrating providers in 2 years.
More likely 5K /24s that were nver aggregated in the first place.
What leads you to the conclusion that these were ever aggregated and
had to punch a hole because they moved?
Curtis
