[59845] in North American Network Operators' Group
failure notice
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Tue Jul 22 21:13:29 2003
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:12:53 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1058922182.6834.TMDA@KOVU.ADNS.NET>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
A bit harsh bearing in mind this address is your legitimate reply address from
the email.. !
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> Hi. This is the TMDA program at adns.net.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> This is probably because this is an internal account that no one is
> supposed to be sending mail to. If you are sending it mail, you are
> probably a low-life, bottom feeding scum sucking spammer who will
> burn in hell. NO addresses at this domain EVER want to hear from you.
>
> What part of that don't you understand?
>
> <nanog@adns.net>:
> Message rejected by recipient.
>
> --- Enclosed is a copy of your message.
>
> >From steve@telecomplete.co.uk Tue Jul 22 21:03:02 2003
> Return-path: <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
> Received: from mail-0.telecomplete.net ([193.0.249.4] helo=mail.telecomplete.net)
> by MAIL.ADNS.NET with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1)
> id 19f822-0001mB-00
> for nanog@adns.net; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 21:03:02 -0400
> Received: from steve (helo=localhost)
> by mail.telecomplete.net with local-esmtp (Exim 4.20)
> id 19f86v-0002RH-Bp; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:08:05 +0100
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:08:05 +0100 (BST)
> From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
> X-X-Sender: steve@MrServer
> To: John Palmer <nanog@adns.net>
> cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: AT&T Canada Problems ???
> In-Reply-To: <01d801c350b3$140ed3f0$8919d797@JPALMERWIN2K>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307230207450.6986-100000@MrServer>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, John Palmer wrote:
>
> > Cannot get to sites on AT&T Canada - Any news regarding the problem cause?
>
> Perhaps the Internet broke?
>
>
>
>