[59798] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Williams/UUNET/Sprint
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard A Steenbergen)
Mon Jul 21 15:40:14 2003
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:39:35 -0400
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
To: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>
Cc: "Nanog@Merit. Edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIIEDGAKAC.deepak@ai.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:37:34PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> Has anyone had to deal with this in their BGP filter tables?
>
> 5 washdc5lce1-oc48.wcg.net (64.200.95.118) 4 ms 11 ms 4 ms
> 6 GigabitEthernet5-0.GW4.IAD8.ALTER.NET (157.130.30.245) 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms
> 7 0.so-1-2-0.XR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.41.34) 3 ms 4 ms 6 ms
> 8 0.so-0-0-0.CL2.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.38.142) 4 ms 5 ms 5 ms
> 9 201.at-2-0-0.XR2.DCA6.ALTER.NET (152.63.35.49) 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms
> 0 0.so-1-3-0.XL2.DCA6.ALTER.NET (152.63.35.118) 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms
> 1 POS7-0.BR4.DCA6.ALTER.NET (152.63.41.233) 8 ms 6 ms 7 ms
> 2 POS5-3.sl-bb22-rly.sprint.net (204.255.169.130) 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms
>
> Is Williams getting transit to Sprint via UUNET or vice versa? Sorry if I
> have been out of the loop on this.
Williams buys transit from UUNet. Williams also pays (or at least paid,
last I looked) Sprint for direct connectivity. Wouldn't surprise me if
they were paying more for the Sprint than they were for the UU, and
decided to consolidate.
It also wouldn't surprise me if they still had a Sprint pipe and yet
accepted more specifics from their transits, I used to see that a lot on
them.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
