[59701] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Fixed IOS datestamps?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Duncan)
Thu Jul 17 19:33:17 2003
To: Scott Call <scall@devolution.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2003 11:52:06 PDT."
<3F16F056.2010404@devolution.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:31:39 -0400
From: Jim Duncan <jnduncan@cisco.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Scott Call writes:
> I started collecting the new IOS files for tonight's reboot of the
> Internet, and I had a quick question.
>
> The datestamps on a lot of the maintainence releases are months old, and
> I just want to make sure I'm getting the right stuff, as they say, so we
> don't have to do this dance again tomorrow.
>
> For example, 12.0S users are recommended to go to 12.0(25)S, which at
> least for the GSR is dated April 14, 2003.
>
> Do I have the right build of 12.0(25)S or will there be one with a date
> closer to the revelation of the exploit showing up on the cisco FTP site?
I just checked the source code. 12.0(25)S does indeed have the fix.
Jim
==
Jim Duncan, Critical Infrastructure Assurance Group, Cisco Systems, Inc.
jnduncan@cisco.com, +1 919 392 6209, http://www.cisco.com/go/ciag/.
PGP: DSS 4096/1024 E09E EA55 DA28 1399 75EB D6A2 7092 9A9C 6DC3 1821
