[5935] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: AGIS/DIGEX

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Neil J. McRae)
Wed Oct 30 10:33:47 1996

To: alan@mindvision.com (Alan Hannan)
cc: neil@easynet.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 30 Oct 1996 08:26:58 CST."
             <199610301426.IAA07285@anka.mindvision.com> 
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@easynet.net>
Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@easynet.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 15:30:30 +0000

On Wed, 30 Oct 1996 08:26:58 -0600 (CST) 
 alan@mindvision.com (Alan Hannan) alleged:

>   You are assuming that the goal of all internet service providers
>   is to have the best connectivity possible, without respect for
>   cost, administrative overhead, or market strategy. 

True :-)

> 
>   If X is really really big, and Y is really really small, then
>   perhaps it would benefit X to have Y as a paying customer instead
>   of as a peer.
> 
>   The word peer implies equals, as it has so long been repeated.
> 
>   If provider X is missing 0.01% of the market share, and provider Y
>   is missing 20% of the market share, who will be more upset, I
>   ask..
> 
Well I feel that the 2 providers mentioned are both reasonably sized enough
to peer with each other, judging a peering policy on how many NAP's
one is connected to is, in my opinion, the policy of the mad.

Neil.
--  
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.          E A S Y N E T  G R O U P  P L C 
neil@EASYNET.NET        NetBSD/sparc: 100% SpF (Solaris protection Factor) 
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post