[59330] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lol - I guess we can all just put IPV6 back in the box.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Zimmerman)
Wed Jun 25 19:44:43 2003
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:44:08 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@csh.rit.edu>
To: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Mail-Followup-To: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <75634F04BFCFD511BF69009027DC86494844B4@mailman.thenap.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:25:36PM -0400, Drew Weaver wrote:
> http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-1020653.html?tag=fd_top
> <http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-1020653.html?tag=fd_top>
Adjacent to the mythical shortage of IPv4 addresses, we find the IPv6 myths,
such as the notion that its larger address space is the only worthwhile
improvement over IPv4.
--
- mdz
